W.D., A JUVENILE, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
W.D., A JUVENILE, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
929 So. 2d 623
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2006)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See J.L. v. State, 684 So. 2d 883 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Butler v. State, 354 So. 2d 437 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Vickers v. State, 303 So. 2d 700 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Packaging Corp. OF Am. v. DeRYCKE, 49 So. 3d 286 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010)…greement to remain intact and ordered disclosure. Id. at 247-48. We also note that the parties did not argue below nor did they raise on appeal any issue as to whether the agreement was against public policy. See, e.g., Nieves v. Snapp Indus., Inc., 929 So. 2d 623, 624 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (holding that trial court correctly denied motion by one of several defendants to enforce agreement, barred as a matter of law, that defendant would pay plaintiff $5000 in exchange for defendant’s agree [*293] ment not to opp…
Authorities Cited
- Vickers v. State, 303 So. 2d 700 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974)
- Butler v. State, 354 So. 2d 437 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)
- Reyes v. State, 684 So. 2d 883 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)