JEFFREY ALLEN HUNTER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1996-04-12
No. 94-04426
RYDER, A.C.J., and DANAHY, J., concur.
685 So. 2d 1332 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1996) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Jeffrey Hunter appeals his convictions for armed burglary, attempted second-degree murder, aggravated battery, and other offenses. The court vacates his grand theft of firearm conviction as a double jeopardy violation and strikes improperly imposed attorney's fees and costs, while affirming the remaining convictions.


Holding

Double jeopardy bars conviction for both armed burglary and grand theft of a firearm when the act of stealing the firearm converts the burglary into an armed burglary, requiring vacation of the grand theft conviction. Attorney's fees imposed without a factual basis regarding hourly rate and time spent, and without prior notice to the defendant, must be struck. Costs imposed without announcement at sentencing or statutory citation must also be struck.


Headnotes

[1] Double jeopardy bars conviction for armed burglary and grand theft of a firearm when the act of stealing the firearm converts the burglary into an armed burglary.

[2] Attorney's fees imposed by a trial court must be based on estimated or actual costs, not arbitrarily imposed.

Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“Double jeopardy bars conviction for armed burglary and grand theft of a firearm when, as here, the act of stealing the firearm converts the burglary into an armed burglary.”

Establishes the core holding that multiple convictions for the same act violate double jeopardy principles

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Hunter was convicted of two counts of armed burglary, two counts of attempted second-degree murder, aggravated battery, shooting within a private buil…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PATTERSON, Judge.

PATTERSON, Judge.

Jeffrey Hunter appeals from his judgment and sentence for two counts of armed burglary, two counts of attempted second-degree murder, aggravated battery, shooting within a private building, and grand theft. We find merit only in Hunter’s arguments regarding double jeopardy and the imposition of fees and costs.

Double jeopardy bars conviction for armed burglary and grand theft of a firearm when, as here, the act of stealing the firearm converts the burglary into an armed burglary. Marrow v. State, 656 So. 2d 579 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied, 664 So. 2d 249 (Fla.1995); see State v. Steams, 645 So. 2d 417 (Fla.1994) (double jeopardy bars convictions and sentences for two offenses involving a firearm that arise from same criminal episode). The state argues that the error is harmless; however, if the grand theft of a firearm conviction is not vacated, it can be scored as prior record in any later sentencing. Thus, we vacate Hunter’s judgment and sentence for grand theft of a firearm.

The trial court imposed $500 in attorney’s fees pursuant to section 27.56, Florida Statutes (1993). As Hunter argues, the record contains no basis for the amount of the fee — nothing reveals the hourly rate or time spent on the case. See Hankerson v. State, 464 So. 2d 700 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985) (attorney’s fees must be based on estimated or actual costs, not arbitrarily imposed). Further, Hunter had no prior notice of the imposition of attorney’s fees or the amount, and no notice of his right to contest the fees; thus, we strike the attorney’s fees without prejudice to reimpose them in compliance with Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.720(d)(1). See Farmer v. State, 617 So. 2d 447 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993); Jones v. State, 623 So. 2d 627 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993).

With respect to costs, we strike the $2 discretionary cost the trial court imposed pursuant to section 943.25(8), Florida Statutes (1993), because the trial court did not announce it at sentencing. Reyes v. State, 655 So. 2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995) (en banc). We also strike the $33 “cost/fine” imposed without citation to statutory authority. Barnes v. State, 658 So. 2d 538 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

Accordingly, we vacate the grand theft conviction and strike certain costs and the attorney’s fees and remand for further proceedings; in all other respects, we affirm.

RYDER, A.C.J., and DANAHY, J., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • State v. Hunter, 689 So. 2d 1066 (Fla. 1997)
    …WELLS, Justice. We have for review Hunter v. State, 685 So. 2d 1332 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996), which addresses the same issue which we recently resolved in Gaber v. State, 684 So. 2d 189 (Fla.1996). We have jurisdiction. Art. Y, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. In Hunter, the defendant was convicted at trial of, among other charges…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw