COUNTY OF SARASOTA, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
CONSTANCE PAOLI ZACKER, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1996-12-11
No. 96-01591
SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and QUINCE and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.
686 So. 2d 664 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1996) Caution
Cited by 16 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s ruling that enjoined Sarasota County from removing a dock located on certain property in Sarasota County, Florida. The appellee’s interest in the dock and the interest of her successors in title are subject to the County’s right, as the owner of the riparian rights to the underlying real property, to seek relief from the injunction should there be a change in circumstances, such as a change in the navigability of the canal or the dock falling into disrepair. SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and QUINCE and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Barr v. Barr, 724 So. 2d 1200 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)
    …ling of the petition for modification. AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED; conflict certified. BOOTH and WOLF, JJ., concur. . A modification which reduces child support may not be applied retroactively. See Livingston v. Livingston, 686 So. 2d 664 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996), and the cases cited therein.…
  • Colette O. deLABRY v. David J. Sales, 134 So. 3d 1110 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014)
    …la. 4th DCA 2012) (citation and quotations omitted). Despite the general rule, the former wife argues that the former husband’s child support obligation should not be applied retroactively based on the following quote from Livingston v. Livingston, 686 So. 2d 664, 665 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996): “While an increase in child support may be made retroactive at the discretion of the lower court, absent extraordinary or compelling circumstances, a reduction in child support may not be made retroactive.” (internal citati…
  • Yockey v. Yockey, 784 So. 2d 582 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)
    …e to the date when the petition was filed. Because the father was not obligated to pay child support subsequent to the child attaining the age of majority, we reverse the order of the trial court. The trial court relied on Livingston v. Livingston, 686 So. 2d 664 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996), which we conclude is not controlling. In Livingston, the court held that a downward retroactive modification was impermissible absent extraordinary or compelling circumstances. 686 So. 2d at 665. However, the trial court modifie…

Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw