ICON DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
JEFFREY WINKELMAN AND JANEE STEINBERG WINKELMAN, HUSBAND AND WIFE, APPELLEES
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Law Of The Case Doctrine cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Reversed. The trial court’s determination that our reversal in Winkelman v. Toll, 661 So. 2d 102 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995), of the final judgment rendered in favor of ICON Development Corporation, disposed either directly or indirectly of all of ICON’S other affirmative defenses to the claims of compensation for condominium expenses and assessments by the Winkelmans is in error. Those affirmative defenses were neither addressed by our prior opinion nor argued in the parties’ briefs. The trial court had expressly stated in the judgment that it had become unnecessary to address those defenses in light of the finding that the property was not part of the condominium. Therefore, our prior opinion is not the law of the cases as to ICON’S affirmative defenses two through seven. See U.S. Concrete Pipe Co. v. Bould, 437 So. 2d 1061, 1063 (Fla.1983); Two M Dev. Corp. v. Mikos, 578 So. 2d 829 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).
Remanded for further proceedings.
WARNER, POLEN and KLEIN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bloco, Inc. v. Porterfield OIL Co., Inc., 990 So. 2d 578 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008)….g., Analyte Diagnostics, 792 So. 2d 1271 (holding that per curiam affirmance was not law of the case where issue was not properly before the court because the question had neither been considered nor ruled upon below); ICON Dev. Corp. v. Winkelman, 687 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (finding that where appellate court’s decision neither directly nor indirectly disposed of certain claims, prior opinion was not law of the case). In conclusion, Porterfield never offered an appropriate contractual or statutory…
-
State v. Strickler, 702 So. 2d 277 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997)…ld only have been based on a theory of set-off, an issue never plead, nor noticed, by the father prior to hearing. Since the issue was not tried by consent, the mother was deprived of due process by the trial court’s action. See Peterson v. Mathies, 687 So. 2d 47, 48 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997). Moreover, there is no record evidence to support the amount of set-off granted, $3,000. REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. BOOTH and WOLF, JJ., and CARITHERS, Associate Judge, con…
-
Wilkinson v. Wilkinson, 756 So. 2d 1081 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000)…a court has an inherent authority to modify child support. Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services v. Morley, 570 So. 2d 402 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). The issue here, however, is one of due process as noted by this court in Peterson v. Mathies, 687 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)(father deprived of due process when at hearing on contempt motion, court decided to modify child support). The record supports the wife in this regard. Thus, the lower court erred in modifying child support relating to Blake with…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- U.S. Concrete Pipe Co. v. Bould, 437 So. 2d 1061 (Fla. 1983)
- TWO M Dev. Corp. v. Mikos, 578 So. 2d 829 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)
- Winkelman v. Toll, 661 So. 2d 102 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)