LOUIS DELEGGE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Investigative Costs cases and more on FLexlaw
FRANK, Judge.
Louis Delegge has been convicted of two counts of interference with child custody and one count of battery. Our review of the issues raised on appeal indicates error only with respect to certain costs and conditions of probation imposed at sentencing. Specifically, we strike an $80.00 investigative cost due to noncompliance with the procedures described in section 939.01, Florida Statutes (1995). James v. State, 662 So. 2d 995 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). We strike that portion of condition four which suggests that a probation officer may permit a convicted felon to carry a firearm. Roberson v. State, 654 So. 2d 1256 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). For lack of oral pronouncement, we strike condition nine requiring a $12.00 payment to the First Step Program and that portion of condition ten requiring Delegge to pay the costs of any substance evaluation and treatment. Id. at 1257. We otherwise affirm the judgment and sentence.
SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and BLUE, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
D.L.B. v. State, 707 So. 2d 844 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998)…sentence, and did not specify the term of community control which was to follow the commitment or the maximum term of commitment, the sentence must be remanded for clarification. See A.J.Y. v. State, 687 So. 2d 921 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997); S.D. v. State, 687 So. 2d 948 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). Moreover, the commitment order should be amended to show that appellant was adjudicated delinquent pursuant to a nolo plea. Finally, the written disposition order must be corrected to conform to the court’s oral announcement tha…
-
Vashaun Smith v. State, 694 So. 2d 838 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997)…the statutory authority for its imposition, section 27.56, Florida Statutes (1995). The court also failed to advise the appellant of his right to contest the amount of the lien under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.720(d)(1). See S.D. v. State, 687 So. 2d 948 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997); Halyard v. State, 667 So. 2d 1028 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996). On remand, the appellant shah have thirty days from the date of the mandate within which to file a written objection to the amount assessed. If an objection is filed with the…
-
S.I. v. State, 784 So. 2d 1208 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)…9). Finally, S.I. argues that the trial court erroneously imposed a public defender lien because it did not notify him of his right to a hearing to contest the amount of the lien under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.720(d)(1). S.D. v. State, 687 So. 2d 948 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). His point is well-taken. Accordingly, on remand S.I. shall have thirty days from the date of this court’s mandate within which to file a written objection to the amount of the lien. If he does so, the assessment shall be strick […
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Roberson v. State, 654 So. 2d 1256 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)
- James v. State, 662 So. 2d 995 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)