TERRANCE HILL, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 1997-04-25
No. 96-1403
Thompson, J., Cobb, J., W. Sharp, J.
692 So. 2d 277 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1997)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Florida appellate court affirmed a probation violation sentence exceeding the six-year youthful offender cap because section 958.14 permits sentences in excess of that cap for substantive probation violations.


Holding

A youthful offender's sentence for a substantive probation violation may exceed the six-year statutory cap under section 958.14, Florida Statutes.


Headnotes

[1] A youthful offender sentenced under Florida law may receive a sentence exceeding the six-year statutory cap when the sentence is imposed for a substantive violation of pr…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Hill pleaded nolo contendere to third-degree murder with a firearm in 1992 and was sentenced as a youthful offender to four years imprisonment plus tw…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, Judge.

THOMPSON, Judge.

Terrance D. Hill appeals the sentence imposed following a probation violation. In 1992, Hill pled nolo contendere to third degree murder with a firearm and was sentenced as a youthful offender to a negotiated four year term of imprisonment followed by two years probation. He violated his probation by driving with a suspended license and by failing to pay the monthly costs of supervision. As a result, the trial court sentenced Hill to seventeen years imprisonment, suspended upon successful completion of three years supervised probation. Hill argues that because he was originally sentenced as a youthful offender, his sentence could not exceed six years.1 However, section 958.14, Florida Statutes (1991), permits sentences in excess of the six-year cap for youthful offenders who commit substantive violations of probation.2 Moreover, this provision was in effect in 1992 when Hill committed the underlying offense and thus, is not an impermissible ex post facto law, as Hill suggests. Cf. Reeves v. State, 605 So. 2d 562 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992).

AFFIRMED.

COBB and W. SHARP, JJ., concur. . § 958.04(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (1991).

. Section 958.14, Florida Statutes (1991), provides, in pertinent part:

A violation or alleged violation of probation or the terms of a community control program shall subject the youthful offender to the provisions of s. 948.06(1). However, no youthful offender shall be committed to the custody of the department for a substantive violation for a period longer than the maximum sentence for the offense for which he was found guilty....

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw