JERMAINE FINCH, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the defendant's robbery conviction was erroneously scored as a first-degree felony, requiring a new sentencing scoresheet.
[1] A conviction for strong arm robbery with a mask, a second degree felony, cannot be reclassified as a first degree felony solely based on the use of a mask, even if the st…
[2] A sentence imposed above the recommended guidelines range constitutes an upward departure, requiring written reasons from the sentencing court.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe defendant was convicted of strong-arm robbery with a mask and sentenced to 125 months. The scoresheet incorrectly classified the offense as a firs…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Felony Reclassification cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Jermaine Finch, was tried by jury and convicted of strong arm robbery with a mask. We affirm the conviction, but reverse his sentence and remand for preparation of a new guidelines scoresheet to be used at his resentencing. Appellant’s second degree strong arm robbery conviction was erroneously scored as a first degree felony (level seven offense — 42 points), rather than as a second degree felony (level six — 36 points). Pursuant to section 775.0845, Florida Statutes (1993), the maximum penalty for the crime of committing a robbery while wearing a mask may be enhanced to that of a first degree felony, but the offense may not be reclassified as such. See Cabal v. State, 678 So. 2d 315 (Fla.1996); Spicer v. State, 615 So. 2d 725 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993).1 The correct ly calculated scoresheet should reflect a guidelines incarceration range of between 73.8 and 123 months. Since appellant was sentenced to 125 months, his sentence amounted to an upward departure from the guidelines without written reasons.
Because the transcript of the hearing indicates that the trial judge was not aware that he was imposing a departure sentence, upon remand, the trial judge will be permitted to consider whether departure is appropriate, and if so, to set forth valid, written reasons for the departure so as to accomplish his original sentencing goals for appellant. See State v. Betancourt, 552 So. 2d 1107 (Fla. 1989).
Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded.2
GLICKSTEIN, KLEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur. . Section 775.0845 was amended in 1995 and may now require reclassification, although in the Cabal decision the supreme court expressly declined to consider whether the amended statute requires reclassification because there, as here, the earlier version of the statute applied. 678 So. 2d at 317 n. 3.
. On remand the trial judge-is instructed to correct Finch's judgment of conviction to reflect that he was convicted of a second degree felony, not a first degree felony.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sumpter v. State, 838 So. 2d 624 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)…pplying section 775.0846, Florida Statutes (2001), the robbery is “reclassified” and “ranked one level above the ranking under ... s. 921.0022 ...,” resulting in a level of seven. See Fla. R. Crim P. 3.704(d)(ll). Appellant cites to Finch v. State, 693 So. 2d 1067 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) and Spicer v. State, 615 So. 2d 725 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993). Both cases stand for the proposition that robbery committed while using a mask may not be reclassified as a first-degree felony. However, both cases were decided prior to th…
Authorities Cited
- State v. Betancourt, 552 So. 2d 1107 (Fla. 1989)
- Cabal v. State, 678 So. 2d 315 (Fla. 1996)
- Spicer v. State, 615 So. 2d 725 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993)