ENRIQUE PEREZ, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ENRIQUE PEREZ, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
696 So. 2d 533
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1997)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Rodriguez v. State, 609 So. 2d 493 (Fla.1992), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 830, 114 S.Ct. 99, 126 L.Ed.2d 66 (1993); Snowden v. State, 537 So. 2d 1383 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 547 So. 2d 1210 (Fla.1989).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bryant Williams v. State, 714 So. 2d 462 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)…made within the framework of a Confrontation Clause discussion, we believe their reasoning is equally applicable in assessing the sufficiency of evidence necessary to sustain a conviction based solely on an excited utterance. See Rodriguez v. State, 696 So. 2d 533 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997).5 For the reasons discussed above, we do not believe that Green controls the present ease, or that this opinion conflicts with Green or any of the cases relied upon by the defendant. Furthermore, the defendant’s implicit suggesti…
-
Sajed Khan v. Deutschman, 282 So. 3d 965 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019)
Authorities Cited
- Rodriguez v. State, 609 So. 2d 493 (Fla. 1992)
- Snowden v. State, 537 So. 2d 1383 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)
- Lynch v. Illinois, 510 U.S. 830 (U.S. 1993)
- Jennings v. Texas, 510 U.S. 830 (U.S. 1993)