JENNINGS

v.

TEXAS

Citator

Cited By

• Neal v. State, 792 So. 2d 613 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)
  …if the prior consistent statement was made after the witness’ motive to lie arose, relying upon Jackson v. State, 498 So. 2d 906 (Fla.1986). However, the Florida Supreme Court also held in Rodriguez v. State, 609 So. 2d 493 (Fla.1992), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 830, 114 S.Ct. 99, 126 L.Ed.2d 66 (1993), that a prior consistent statement that a witness gives before plea negotiations is admissible because it is given before the witness’ motive to lie arises. Despite defense counsel’s accusations, Williams repeate…
• Davis v. State, 694 So. 2d 113 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)
  …0 years in prison as a habitual violent felony offender. This appeal follows. Prior consistent statements are generally inadmissible to corroborate or bolster a witness’s trial testimony. Rodriguez v. State, 609 So. 2d 493 (Fla.1992), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 830, 114 S.Ct. 99, 126 L.Ed.2d 66 (1993); Jackson v. State, 498 So. 2d 906 (FIa.1986). Because prior consistent statements are hearsay, they are inadmissible as substantive evidence unless they fall within the hearsay exception for identification of a p…
• Perez v. State, 696 So. 2d 533 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)
  …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Rodriguez v. State, 609 So. 2d 493 (Fla.1992), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 830, 114 S.Ct. 99, 126 L.Ed.2d 66 (1993); Snowden v. State, 537 So. 2d 1383 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 547 So. 2d 1210 (Fla.1989).…