SHERYL RODWIN-PINES, APPELLANT,
v.
IRWIN PINES, APPELLEE
SHERYL RODWIN-PINES, APPELLANT,
IRWIN PINES, APPELLEE
706 So. 2d 946
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1998)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
In the instant case, the appellant asks this Court to resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court’s judgment was not supported by the evidence. However, the appellant’s failure to file a trial transcript renders the record inadequate to demonstrate reversible error. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979). Because the decision of the trial court has the presumption of correctness and because the appellant has failed in her burden to demonstrate reversible error, Applegate, 377 So. 2d at 1152, we affirm the judgment under review.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Acosta v. Creative Grp. Invs., Inc., 756 So. 2d 193 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)…So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979). See also White v. White, 717 So. 2d 89, 90 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)(where there is no transcript of hearing in the appellate record the appellate court will not disturb the findings of the trial court); Rodwin-Pines v. Pines, 706 So. 2d 946 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)(stating that “the appellant’s failure to file a trial transcript renders the record inadequate to demonstrate reversible error.”). Accordingly, for the reasons above, we affirm.. . "Contempt” has been defined as a disobedience…
-
Baez v. Padron, 715 So. 2d 1128 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)…eal. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979); see also Bankers Ins. Co. v. Grenko, 707 So. 2d 1185, 1185 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Lederman v. Shore, 707 So. 2d 1134, 1135 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Rodwin-Pines v. Pines, 706 So. 2d 946, 946 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998). Accordingly, we must affirm the final judgment entered pursuant to the jury’s verdict. Affirmed.…
Authorities Cited
- Pitcher v. Schneider (Fla. 5th DCA 2018)
- Albert v. Applegate et ux., 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1979)