MAGALY BAEZ, APPELLANT,
v.
ARMANDO PADRON, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Appellate Review cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The appellant has the affirmative duty to present the appellate court with an adequate record for appellate review; indeed, this rudimentary principle is inseparably connected to and well grounded in appellate review. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.200(e); see also Seal Prods, v. Mansfield, 705 So. 2d 973, 975 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); Van Den Boom v. YLB Invs., Inc., 687 So. 2d 964, 965 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997); Graham v. Lomar Indus., 583 So. 2d 819, 820 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); McNair v. Pavlakos/McNair Dev. Co., 576 So. 2d 933, 933 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991). Thus, in the absence of an adequate record of the proceedings below, we cannot resolve the issues raised in this appeal. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979); see also Bankers Ins. Co. v. Grenko, 707 So. 2d 1185, 1185 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Lederman v. Shore, 707 So. 2d 1134, 1135 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Rodwin-Pines v. Pines, 706 So. 2d 946, 946 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998). Accordingly, we must affirm the final judgment entered pursuant to the jury’s verdict.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Diaz v. State, 804 So. 2d 620 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)…PER CURIAM. In considering a prior claim by this defendant, we determined that the trial court had correctly concluded that defendant’s sentence should run consecutive to his original prior conviction. See Diaz v. State 715 So. 2d 1128 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) (ordering defendant’s sentences on case numbers 93-30316, 93-33038, and 93-33837 were to run consecutive to sentences currently being served). Following remand, the defendant was charged with eight new separate felonies. In each c…
Authorities Cited (11 total)
- Pitcher v. Schneider (Fla. 5th DCA 2018)
- Albert v. Applegate et ux., 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1979)
- Seal Prods. v. Mansfield, 705 So. 2d 973 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)
- McNAIR v. Pavlakos/McNAIR Dev. Co., 576 So. 2d 933 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991)
- Lederman v. Shore, 707 So. 2d 1134 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)
- Cees van den Boom v. YLB Invs., Inc., 687 So. 2d 964 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)
- Bankers Ins. Co. v. Grenko, 707 So. 2d 1185 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)
- USAA Cas. Ins. Co. v. Gordon, 707 So. 2d 1185 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)
- Mode, Inc. v. Hardrives Co., 583 So. 2d 819 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991)
- Rodwin-Pines v. Irwin Pines, 706 So. 2d 946 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)