JOSE CIFUENTES, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JOSE CIFUENTES, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
717 So. 2d 136
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1998)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the revocation of defendant’s probation and the sentence imposed. See Inman v. State, 684 So. 2d 899 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996). We remand, however, for entry of a written revocation order specifically listing the conditions of probation defendant was found to have violated, as no such order appears in the record. Taramona v. State, 707 So. 2d 1194 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); Palacios v. State, 706 So. 2d 1382 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); Bryant v. State, 686 So. 2d 784 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997).
Affirmed and remanded with instructions.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Bryant v. State, 686 So. 2d 784 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)
- Inman v. State, 684 So. 2d 899 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996)
- Taramona v. State, 707 So. 2d 1194 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)
- Narciso Alberto v. Dep't OF Child. & Families, 707 So. 2d 1194 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)
- Shelton v. State, 706 So. 2d 1382 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)
- Palacios v. State, 706 So. 2d 1382 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)