NARCISO ALBERTO, APPELLANT,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, ETC., APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Ramdamar v. State, 848 So. 2d 454 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)
  …PER CURIAM. We affirm the order revoking the appellant’s probation but remand for the trial court to enter a written order in accordance with its oral pronouncement. See Taramona v. State, 707 So. 2d 1194 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998). GUNTHER, POLEN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.…
• Bingham v. State, 719 So. 2d 1032 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)
  …CURIAM We affirm the order revoking the appellant’s probation but remand for the trial court to reduce to writing its reasons and the evidence relied upon for the revocation in accordance with the court’s oral pronouncement. See Taramona v. State, 707 So. 2d 1194 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); Salvatierra v. State, 691 So. 2d 32 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); Bryant v. State, 686 So. 2d 784 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); Maddox v. State, 619 So. 2d 473 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). Because this will be purely a ministerial act, appellant’s presence…
• Cifuentes v. State, 717 So. 2d 136 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)
  …. State, 684 So. 2d 899 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996). We remand, however, for entry of a written revocation order specifically listing the conditions of probation defendant was found to have violated, as no such order appears in the record. Taramona v. State, 707 So. 2d 1194 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); Palacios v. State, 706 So. 2d 1382 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); Bryant v. State, 686 So. 2d 784 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). Affirmed and remanded with instructions.…

Authorities Cited

• In the Interest of T.M. and F.M., 641 So. 2d 410 (Fla. 1994)
• T.C. v. Dep't of Health & Rehabilitative Servs., 681 So. 2d 893 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)
• In the Interest of R.W.P. v. Penchansky, 634 So. 2d 722 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)