CARL D. BOND, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (18 total)

• Adams v. State, 800 So. 2d 741 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)
  …rcise of discretion in ruling on a motion for mitigation pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c) is not subject to review on appeal, the appeal is dismissed. See Royal v. State, 736 So. 2d 157 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) and Lusskin v. State, 717 So. 2d 1076, 1077 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). APPEAL DISMISSED. HARRIS, PALMER and ORFINGER, R.B., JJ., concur.…
• Cowart v. State, 860 So. 2d 1041 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)
  …ctice that departs from the well recognized assumption that sentencing is an individualized procedure”); Lester v. State, 446 So. 2d 1088 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984) (applying rule 3.700(c) in context of revocation of probation proceeding); Lusskin v. State, 717 So. 2d 1076 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (apply [*1043] ing rule 3.700(c) in context of motion to mitigate sentence); Clemons v. State, 816 So. 2d 1180 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) (applying rule 3.700(c) in context of resentencing after appeal). The successor judge, if any, may…
• Royal v. State, 736 So. 2d 157 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)
  …PER CURIAM. As the trial court’s exercise of discretion in ruling on a motion for mitigation pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c) is not subject to review on appeal, the appeal is dismissed. See Lusskin v. State, 717 So. 2d 1076, 1077 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Moya v. State, 668 So. 2d 279, 280 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996); Bourjolly v. State, 623 So. 2d 870 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). However, points I and II of the motion to mitigate raise claims of ineffective assistance of counsel and a const…

Authorities Cited

• Bond v. State, 675 So. 2d 184 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)