TONY LYNN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Tony Lynn appealed the trial court's denial of his second motion for belated appeal of his 1993 conviction. The First District Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, finding that Lynn failed to timely appeal and that his post-conviction motion was time-barred.
The appellate court lacked jurisdiction because Lynn failed to timely appeal the denial of his post-conviction motion. The trial court properly denied both the first motion as facially insufficient and the second motion as time-barred under Rule 3.850(b). The new Rule 9.140(j), effective January 1, 1997, did not revive claims already time-barred under Rule 3.850(b).
[1] A timely filing of a notice of appeal is a jurisdictional matter.
[2] A motion for post-conviction relief must be filed within two years after the judgment and sentence become final, absent specific exceptions.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“timely filing of notice of appeal is jurisdictional matter”
Establishes the fundamental requirement that appeals must be timely filed to give the court jurisdiction.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceLynn was convicted and sentenced in 1993. He filed a first motion for post-conviction relief in 1995, which the trial court denied as facially insuffi…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Motion For Belated Appeal cases and more on FLexlaw
SHIVERS, Douglass B., Senior Judge.
Tony Lynn appeals an order of the trial court denying his second motion for belated appeal of his 1993 conviction and sentence. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Williams v. State, 324 So. 2d 74 (Fla.1975) (timely filing of notice of appeal is jurisdictional matter).
In accordance with the procedures then in effect, as set forth in State v. District Court of Appeal, First District, 569 So. 2d 439 (Fla.1990) (announcing that claims for belated appeal on grounds such as those presented in the case at bar were to be presented in the trial court by way of a motion for post-conviction relief), Lynn sought post-conviction relief in the circuit court. After a careful review of the record, we conclude that the trial court properly denied Lynn’s 1995 timely first motion as facially insufficient, and that his 1996 second motion was time-barred under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850(b) (designating a two-year deadline for filing a motion for post-conviction relief after judgment and sentence become final). Compounding his two prior errors, Lynn waited eight months to file a notice of appeal challenging the denial of his post-conviction motion. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(3) (defendant wishing to appeal “a final judgment” must do so within “30 days following rendition of a written order”); Williams, supra.
The promulgation of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(j), effective January 1, 1997, superseded State v. District Court. See Amendments to the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, 685 So. 2d 773, 807 (Fla.1996) (Committee Notes). The new rule sets out a new procedure for requesting a belated appeal by initiating a habeas corpus proceeding directly in the district court of appeal. Allen v. State, 707 So. 2d 381 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998). However, we find no basis to conclude that the new rule revived. State v. District Court claims such as Lynn’s that were already time-barred under Rule 3.850(b). Finch v. State, 23 Fla. L. Weekly D2020, 717 So. 2d 1070 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) (promulgation of new Rule 9.140(j) did not revive appellant’s “belated appeal” claim that was already time-barred in 1994 under the two-year timetable set forth in Rule 3.850(b)).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
BARFIELD, C.J., and DAVIS, J„ concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Horton v. State, 734 So. 2d 1050 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)…PER CURIAM. DENIED. Lynn v. State, 719 So. 2d 38 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) and Finch v. State, 717 So. 2d 1070, 23 Fla. L. Weekly 2020 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). KAHN and DAVIS, JJ., and SHIVERS, DOUGLASS B., Senior Judge, concur.…
-
McPHERSON v. Singletary, 724 So. 2d 713 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)…PER CURIAM. DENIED. Lynn v. State, 719 So. 2d 38 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Finch v. State, 717 So. 2d 1070 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). WOLF, WEBSTER and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.…
-
Rose v. State, 732 So. 2d 338 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)…[*339] PER CURIAM. DENIED. Lynn v. State, 719 So. 2d 38 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) and Finch v. State, 23 Fla. L. Weekly 2020, 717 So. 2d 1070 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). MINER, ALLEN and DAVIS, JJ., concur.…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Amendments to the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, 685 So. 2d 773 (Fla. 1996)
- Williams v. State, 324 So. 2d 74 (Fla. 1975)
- State v. Dist. Court of Appeal of Fla., 569 So. 2d 439 (Fla. 1990)
- Hendrix v. Singletary, 717 So. 2d 1070 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)
- Finch v. State, 717 So. 2d 1070 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)
- Allen v. State, 707 So. 2d 381 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998)