GUILLERMO FERRERO, APPELLANT,
v.
BETTY CORRINNE EDMONDSON FERRERO, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1998-11-18
No. 98-1913
STONE, C.J., and POLEN and KLEIN, JJ., concur.
720 So. 2d 320 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1998) Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse, in part, the order finding Appellant in civil contempt. Although the order allows Appellant to avoid incarceration by paying a purge, it fails to include a provision that would allow him to purge his contempt after incarceration by paying the purge amount. On remand, the order must be amended to include such a provision. Alves v. Barnett Mortgage Co., 688 So. 2d 459, 460 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). The order is affirmed in all other respects.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED and REMANDED in part.

STONE, C.J., and POLEN and KLEIN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Flores v. Bieluch, 814 So. 2d 448 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)
    …id incarceration by paying a purge, it fails to include a provision which would allow him to purge his contempt after incarceration by paying the purge amount. On remand, the order must be amended to include such a provision. See Ferrero v. Ferrero, 720 So. 2d 320 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Alves v. Barnett Mortgage Co., 688 So. 2d 459, 460 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). The petition is denied in all other respects. We find that the respondent, Debra Flores, presented substantial, competent evidence of petitioner’s present…
  • Garcia v. Viking Life-Saving Equip. Am., Inc., 728 So. 2d 295 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)
    …s not rise to the level of the “misconduct” required to deprive a former employee of unemployment compensation benefits. See Navarrete v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 726 So. 2d 833 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); Delaney v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 720 So. 2d 320 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Barnes v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 717 So. 2d 120 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Savage v. Macy’s East, Inc., 719 So. 2d 1208, 1209 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), and eases collected at n. 2. Accordingly, the order denying benefits is reversed a…
  • …isconduct justifying denial of benefits); Gonzalez v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 752 So. 2d 726 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)(same); Fenelus v. Publix Super Mkts., Inc., 727 So. 2d 274 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)(same); Delaney v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 720 So. 2d 320 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)(using company e-mail to send joke after non-specific warning was a single act of poor judgment rather than wilful or wanton disregard of employer’s interest). See generally Carol Schultz Vento, Annotation, Use of Employer’s EMail…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw