GERARD MAYERS, APPELLANT,
v.
EVELYN MAYERS, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1999-05-28
No. 98-04114
CASANUEVA and SALCINES, JJ., Concur.
734 So. 2d 544 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1999) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
BLUE,

Acting Chief Judge.

This was a bitter and very hotly contested custody battle. We have thoroughly reviewed the record and arguments on appeal. Although we may not have reached the same decision as the trial court in this case, under the appropriate standard of review we are required to affirm.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA and SALCINES, JJ., Concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Marchenko v. Sunshine Cos. & Unisource Administrators, 894 So. 2d 311 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005)
    …ited authority on numerous occasions. See e.g., Pace, 868 So. 2d at 1287 (holding that because the statutes did not give the JCC the authority to sanction an attorney, the JCC did not have the power to do so); Salony v. S. Pla. Public Communication, 734 So. 2d 544, 545 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (stating that "a JCC has no jurisdiction to enforce a prior compensation order”; "[s]uch a proceeding must be brought in the circuit court”); Farhangi v. Dunkin Donuts, 728 So. 2d 772, 773 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (holding that b…
  • Shaffer v. Wal-Mart Store # 1171 & Claims Mgmt., Inc., 791 So. 2d 524 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)
    …isi relief may be available to claimant” in circuit court to enforce the prior order. Contrary to the JCC’s ruling, the JCC has jurisdiction to determine the amount of deemed earnings as an offset. See Salony v. South Florida Public Communication, 734 So. 2d 544 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)(JCC has jurisdiction to determine the correct amount of offset and the resulting amount of benefits due). Accordingly, we reverse the JCC’s denial of the claim for temporary partial disability benefits from December 4, 1994 throu…
  • Pace v. Miami-Dade Cnty. Sch. Bd. & Gallagher Bassett Servs., Inc., 868 So. 2d 1286 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004)
    …n, a judge of compensation claims does not have inherent judicial power but only the power expressly conferred by chapter 440.” McFadden v. Hardrives Constr., Inc., 573 So. 2d 1057, 1059 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); see Salony v. S. Fla. Pub. Communication, 734 So. 2d 544, 545 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (noting that a “JCC lacks contempt authority”). Nothing in chapter 440 gives the JCC the authority, power, or jurisdiction to conduct an attorney disciplinary proceeding or sanction an attorney for a violation of the Florida…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw