SVETLANA MARCHENKO, APPELLANT,
v.
SUNSHINE COMPANIES AND UNISOURCE ADMINISTRATORS, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) lacks jurisdiction to vacate a settlement agreement reached privately under section 440.20(11)(c), Florida Statutes.
Claimant sought to vacate a settlement agreement. The Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) denied the motion, finding a lack of jurisdiction.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Jurisdiction Of Judge Of Compensation Claims cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Claimant Svetlana Marchenko appeals the order of the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC), denying claimant’s motion to vacate or set aside a settlement agreement reached in accordance with section 440.20(ll)(c), Florida Statutes (2001). The JCC determined that he did not have jurisdiction to vacate such an agreement. We agree and, therefore, affirm.
The JCC is empowered only to the extent the statutes provide. See Pace v. Miami-Dade County Sch. Bd., 868 So. 2d 1286, 1287 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004). “ ‘Unlike a court of general jurisdiction, a judge of compensation claims does not have inherent judicial power but only the power expressly conferred by chapter 440.’ ” Id. (quoting McFadden v. Hardrives Constr., Inc., 573 So. 2d 1057, 1059 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)).1 The statutes give the JCC neither the authority to approve settlements under section 440.20(1l)(c) nor the power to vacate or set aside a settlement reached privately between the parties under the statute. Thus, the JCC did not err in finding that he was without jurisdiction to vacate the settlement agreement.
AFFIRMED.
WOLF, C.J., KAHN and POLSTON, JJ., concur. . This Court has recognized the JCC's limited authority on numerous occasions. See e.g., Pace, 868 So. 2d at 1287 (holding that because the statutes did not give the JCC the authority to sanction an attorney, the JCC did not have the power to do so); Salony v. S. Pla. Public Communication, 734 So. 2d 544, 545 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (stating that "a JCC has no jurisdiction to enforce a prior compensation order”; "[s]uch a proceeding must be brought in the circuit court”); Farhangi v. Dunkin Donuts, 728 So. 2d 772, 773 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (holding that because there was not an express authority for it, the JCC did not have the power to "award medical treatment outside of an authorized managed care arrangement" or “otherwise 'strike' the managed care arrangement”).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sanders v. City OF Orlando, 997 So. 2d 1089 (Fla. 2008)…ented by counsel. Compare Flamily, 924 So. 2d at 78 (holding that due to the retroactive application of the amendment to section 440.20(ll)(c) the JCC was without jurisdiction to set aside a 1996 settlement agreement); and Marchenko v. Sunshine Co., 894 So. 2d 311 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (holding that since the 2001 amendment to section 440.20(ll)(c) the JCC is without jurisdiction to approve or set aside settlement agreements); with Vallecillo v. Bachiller Ironworks, 982 So. 2d 734 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (holding t…1 / 2
-
Flamily v. City OF Orlando & City of Orlando Risk Mgmt., 924 So. 2d 78 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006)…g firefighters than in the general public. Accordingly, the JCC’s conclusion that Claimant’s hepatitis C was not an occupational disease is affirmed. [*80] The JCC’s Jurisdiction to Set Aside Settlement Agreement In Marchenko v. Sunshine Companies, 894 So. 2d 311 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005), this court determined that a JCC no longer has jurisdiction to vacate settlement agreements pursuant to the statutory changes made in 2001 to section 440.20(ll)(c), Florida Statutes. Under Florida’s workers’ compensation law, a…
Authorities Cited
- J.W. McFADDEN v. Hardrives Constr., Inc., 573 So. 2d 1057 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)
- Janelle McMILLAN v. Dep't of Child. & Families, 868 So. 2d 1286 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004)
- Boltri v. Singletary, 728 So. 2d 772 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)
- Nahid Farhangi v. Dunkin Donuts & Associated Indus. Ins. Co., 728 So. 2d 772 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)
- Mayers v. Mayers, 734 So. 2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999)
- Salony v. South Florida Public Communication, 734 So. 2d 544 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)