D.R.E., A CHILD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1999-05-19
No. 98-03980
PARKER, C.J., and NORTHCUTT, J., and SCHEB, JOHN M. (Senior) Judge, Concur.
735 So. 2d 527 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1999) Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

D.R.E. appeals the trial court’s order which adjudicated him delinquent for obstructing or opposing an officer without violence in violation of section 843.02, Florida Statutes (1997). We affirm.

D.R.E. argues that the State failed to prove a prima facie case of violation of section 843.02 because issuing a trespass warning is not a legal duty. However, D.R.E.’s motion for judgment of acquittal failed to properly preserve this argument for appeal. See Bertolotti v. Dugger, 514 So. 2d 1095, 1096 (Fla.1987).

Affirmed.

PARKER, C.J., and NORTHCUTT, J., and SCHEB, JOHN M. (Senior) Judge, Concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Lennar Homes, Inc. v. Dorta-Duque, 972 So. 2d 872 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007)
    …cial in nature. See Bd. of County Comm’rs of Brevard County v. Snyder, 627 So. 2d 469, 474 (Fla.1993); Parker Family Trust v. City of Jacksonville, 804 So. 2d 493, 497 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). See also Am. Riviera Real Estate Co. v. City of Miami Beach, 735 So. 2d 527, 527 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); Grace v. Town of Palm Beach, 656 So. 2d 945, 946 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). As a result, pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.190(b)(3)11, which gov [*886] erns the proceedings below, the decision was reviewable by pe…
  • Michael Linet, Inc. v. The Vill. OF Wellington, 408 F.3d 757 (11th Cir. 2005)
    …to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over this claim once the Telecommunications Act claim was dismissed. The district court therefore correctly dismissed Linet’s state law due process claim. See Am. Riviera Real Estate Co. v. City of Miami Beach, 735 So. 2d 527 (Fla. 3d DCA1999). Alter or Amend the Judgment Finally Linet appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to amend or alter the final judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). Linet’s motion to the district court urged it to reconsi…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw