LENORIS DRUMWRIGHT, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Lenoris Drumwright appeals the denial of his motion to correct his 1993 sentences for three firearm-related felonies. The court holds that the trial court improperly reclassified the offenses by treating the use of a firearm as an aggravating factor when it was an essential element of the crimes, resulting in excessive minimum mandatory sentences.
The court holds that the trial court improperly reclassified the offenses because the use of a firearm was an essential element of each crime and could not be used as grounds for reclassification. The court vacates the sentences in part and remands for resentencing with proper maximum and minimum mandatory terms for each offense.
[1] A felony offense cannot be reclassified to a higher degree based on the use of a firearm when the use of a firearm is an essential element of the original offense.
[2] A third-degree felony conviction for aggravated assault with a firearm, when sentenced as a habitual violent offender, cannot result in a sentence exceeding ten years inc…
Previewing 2 of 6 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“It was improper for the trial court to reclassify the offense as a second degree felony because the use of a firearm was an essential element of the aggravated assault.”
Establishes the core holding that firearm use cannot serve as a reclassifying factor when it is an essential element of the crime
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceDrumwright was convicted in 1993 of three offenses: aggravated assault with a firearm while wearing a mask, aggravated battery with a firearm while we…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Essential Element Of Offense cases and more on FLexlaw
PETERSON, J.
Lenoris Drumwright appeals the denial of his Rule 3.800(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, motion to correct his sentence imposed in 1993. His convictions and sentences were:
Conviction Sentence
1. Aggravated assault with a firearm while wearing a mask; a third degree felony. § 784.021(2), Fla.Stat. (1997). Reclassified as a second degree felony because of the use of a firearm.
2. Aggravated battery with a firearm while wearing a mask, a second degree felony; § 784.045(l)(a)(2), Fla. Stat. (1997). Reclassified as a first degree felony because of the use of a firearm.
3. Aggravated assault on a law enforcement officer with a firearm while wearing a mask; a second degree felony. § 784.07(2)(e), Fla.Stat. (1997) Reclassified as a first degree felony because of the firearm.
For each of the convictions, Drumwright was sentenced as an habitual violent offender and received concurrent sentences of 15 years in incarceration with a minimum mandatory of 15 years.
We vacate the sentences in part and remand for resentencing for the following reasons:
1. Aggravated assault with a firearm while wearing a mask. It was improper for the trial court to reclassify the offense as a second degree felony because the use of a firearm was an essential element of the aggravated assault. See § 784.021(1)(a), Fla.Stat. (1997). See also Harrelson v. State, 624 So. 2d 828 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). Drumwright’s aggravated assault conviction, a third degree felony, could not incur more than ten years incarceration with a minimum mandatory term of five years as an habitual violent offender. § 775.084(4)(b)(3), Fla.Stat. (1997). We also note that the enhanced penalty statute for wearing a mask was not changed to increase the degree of the felony until 1997, after Drumwright was sentenced. See § 775.0845 Fla.Stat. (1997).
2. Aggravated battery with a firearm. The same reasoning applies to this charge as discussed above. See Lareau v. State, 573 So. 2d 813 (Fla.1991) (aggravated battery predicated on use of a deadly weapon is not subject to reclassification pursuant to section 775.087(1) because the use of the weapon is an essential element of the crime). The offense should have been classified as a second degree felony thereby incurring an habitual violent offender sentence of a term of incarceration not exceeding 30 years with a minimum mandatory term of 10 years. § 775.084(4)(b)(2), Fla.Stat. (1997).
3. Aggravated assault on a law enforcement officer with a firearm. This offense is a second degree felony. See § 784.07(2)(c), Fla.Stat. (1997). Use of a firearm is also an essential element of the crime and cannot be used to reclassify the degree of felony. Again the imposition of a 15 year minimum mandatory term exceeded the 10 year maximum.
Because the sentencing errors are apparent on the face of the record and no evidentiary hearing is necessary, we vacate the sentences in part or in full as indicated below and remand for resentencing:
1. The aggravated assault: the sentence is vacated; the trial court may re-sentence for a term of incarceration not exceeding ten years with a minimum mandatory term of five years.
2. The aggravated battery: the 15 year minimum mandatory provision is vacated; the trial court shall impose a 10 year minimum mandatory in its stead.
3. The aggravated assault on a law enforcement officer: the 15 year minimum mandatory provision is vacated; the trial court shall impose a 10 year minimum on remand. Except as noted above, the sentences for the aggravated battery and the aggravated assault on a law enforcement officer are affirmed.
AFFIRMED in part; VACATED in part; REMANDED.
ANTOON, C.J., and W. SHARP, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Espiet v. State, 797 So. 2d 598 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)…the inclusion of the eighteen points for use of a firearm along with the imposition of the minimum mandatory sentence. Use of a firearm is an essential element of aggravated assault on a law enforcement officer with .a firearm. Drumwright v. State, 743 So. 2d 1120 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999). In the instant case, a three-year mandatory minimum sentence was imposed based on Espiet’s use of a firearm. § 775.087(2), Fla. Stat. (2000). We conclude, therefore, that it was error to add points for the use of a firearm on th…
-
Biggs v. State, 801 So. 2d 229 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)…ged with aggravated battery with a firearm. The assessment for the use of a firearm was improper because his underlying offense, aggravated battery with a firearm, carries with it the essential element of carrying a firearm. See Drumwright v. State, 743 So. 2d 1120, 1121 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999). Biggs’ scoresheet total should have been 96 rather than 114 and he is entitled to a corrected scoresheet. See Poole v. State, 777 So. 2d 1186, 1187 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001). REMANDED. COBB and HARRIS, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Hervey Lareau v. State, 573 So. 2d 813 (Fla. 1991)
- Riley v. Parker, 624 So. 2d 828 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)
- Harrelson v. State, 624 So. 2d 828 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)