CEDRIC THOMPSON, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1999-10-13

Nos. 98-707, 98-581

Before JORGENSON, GREEN, and SHEVIN, JJ.

744 So. 2d 527 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1999) Positive Treatment

Cited by 2 cases

Topics

Violation Of Due Process Clause Violation Due Process Clause

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Violation Of Due Process Clause cases and more on FLexlaw

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the appellant’s convictions and sentences for armed robbery and unlawful use of a firearm during the commission of a felony. With the exception of the appellant’s conviction and sentence for unlawful possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony which the state properly concedes must be stricken and vacated as being violative of the due process clause where it stemmed from the commission of a single act, see Cleveland v. State, 587 So. 2d 1145, 1146 (Fla.1991); Davis v. State, 710 So. 2d 723,-724 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), we find no merit to the remaining points on appeal.

Accordingly, we affirm the appellant’s convictions and sentences for armed robbery but strike and vacate his conviction and sentence for the unlawful use of a firearm during the commission of a felony.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

Konduko T. Bufford v. State, 803 So. 2d 914 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)

…fense must be vacated where he was also convicted of robbery with a firearm arising from the same act. See Cleveland v. State, 587 So. 2d 1145, 1146 (Fla.1991). See also Buffington v. State, 776 So. 2d 960, 961 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); Thompson v. State, 744 So. 2d 527 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); Cooper v. State, 727 So. 2d 266 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998). Accordingly, we reverse with directions that the appellant’s conviction for unlawful [*915] possession of a firearm while engaged in a criminal offense be vacated. Reversed wi…
Sheldon v. Sheldon, 757 So. 2d 1263 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)

…o therapy as a group. The former wife cannot be found in contempt on that date for failure to follow that order. “For a person to be held in contempt of a court order, ... the behavior of the person must clearly violate the order.” Curry v. Robbins, 744 So. 2d 527, 528 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) (quoting Paul v. Johnson, 604 So. 2d 883, 884 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992)). The former wife’s behavior, as described in the motion for contempt does not violate any court order entered before that motion. Based on the foregoing we r…

Authorities Cited

Quinten L. Cleveland v. State, 587 So. 2d 1145 (Fla. 1991)
Davis v. State, 710 So. 2d 723 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw