SCOTT DEANGELO JONES, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Herzog v. K-Mart Corp., 760 So. 2d 1006 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)
  …granted, see, e.g., Brown, 749 So. 2d 490; E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc. v. Farnes, 697 So. 2d 825 (Fla.1997); Baptist Mem’l Hosp., Inc., 384 So. 2d 145 (Fla.1980), [*1009] or has been denied, see, e.g., Reid v. Medical & Prof'l Mgmt. Consultants, Inc., 744 So. 2d 1116 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). . K-Mart’s offer was "inclusive of costs.” Appellants’ taxable pre-offer costs, to which they are entitled under section 57.041, Florida Statutes, apparently are yet to be determined. When determined, those costs added to the a…
• Robinson v. Weiland, 936 So. 2d 777 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)
  …3); see also Southwin, Inc. v. Verde, 806 So. 2d 586, 587 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (“The standard of review for the denial of a motion for new trial is whether or not the trial court abused its discretion.”); Reid v. Med. & Prof'l Mgmt. Consultants, Inc., 744 So. 2d 1116 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (holding that that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying a motion for new trial based on the grounds the verdict was against the manifest weight of the evidence); Roach v. CSX Transp., Inc., 598 So. 2d 246, 249…
• Rogers v. Waste Pro of Fla., Inc. (Fla. 1st DCA 2024)
  …ny such weight as it deserves considering the witnesses’ qualification, the reasons given by the witness for the opinion expressed, and all other evidence in the case, including lay testimony.”); see also Reid v. Med. & Pro. Mgmt. Consultants, Inc., 744 So. 2d 1116 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying a motion for new trial because in an ordinary negligence case, the jury is free to accept or reject the testimony of a medical expert). OSTERHAUS, C.J., and RO…

Authorities Cited

• Siegel v. State, 586 So. 2d 1341 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991)
• Henry v. State, 679 So. 2d 885 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)
• McKAY v. State, 715 So. 2d 1001 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)