TANNIE DEONDRE BURKE, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
TANNIE DEONDRE BURKE, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
745 So. 2d 1074
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1999)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Because the defendant withdrew his request to discharge court-appointed counsel, the trial court was not required to continue its Nelson inquiry.1 See Lowe v. State, 650 So. 2d 969, 975 (Fla.1994), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 887, 116 S.Ct. 230, 133 L.Ed.2d 159 (1995). Accordingly, we affirm the defendant’s convictions and sentences.
. Nelson v. State, 274 So. 2d 256 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Levi v. Levi, 780 So. 2d 261 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)…and the ability of the parent to pay exists at the time the petition for modification is filed. See Butler v. Brewster, 629 So. 2d 1092, 1093 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Anderson v. Anderson, 609 So. 2d 87, 89 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); see also Young v. Young, 745 So. 2d 1074, 1076-77 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). Here, the unrebutted testimony was that the children’s needs had substantially increased since 1992. Thus, we hold that the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to make the increase in child support retroactive…
Authorities Cited
- Nelson v. State, 274 So. 2d 256 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973)
- Thompson v. State, 650 So. 2d 969 (Fla. 1994)
- Hypolite v. North Carolina, 516 U.S. 887 (U.S. 1995)
- Grimm v. Angelone, 516 U.S. 887 (U.S. 1995)