ARC FOODS, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
MGI PROPERTIES, A MASSACHUSETTS BUSINESS TRUST, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
ARC Foods, Inc. appeals the trial court’s award of attorney’s fees and costs to MGI Properties. At the time the award was entered, MGI was entitled to recover fees and costs as the prevailing party in the underlying litigation. However, we have since reversed the final judgment in favor of MGI and remanded for further proceedings in ARC Foods, Inc. v. MGI Properties, 724 So. 2d 663 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). Our reversal of the final judgment requires reversal of the “Supplement to Amended Judgment” in which the fees and costs were awarded. See Nathanson v. Houss, 717 So. 2d 114, 117 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).
Reversed.
FULMER, A.C.J., and NORTHCUTT and GREEN, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Robert Jeffrey Chaskes, D.O. v. Gutierrez, 116 So. 3d 479 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013)…court’s award of attorney’s fees and costs to Gutierrez. See, e.g., Packaging Corp. of Am. v. DeRycke, 49 So. 3d 286, 294 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010); Progressive Express Ins. Co. v. Menendez, 979 So. 2d 335 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008); ARC Foods, Inc. v. MGI Props., 746 So. 2d 514, 514 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). Reversed and remanded. . The trial testimony was that, generally, a stage I pressure ulcer (or bedsore) is a condition where the skin is darker in pigmentation, warm, hard, and swollen; a stage II pressure ulcer is a condi…
-
Progressive Express Ins. Co. v. Menendez, 979 So. 2d 335 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008)…48 (Fla. 3d DCA March 19, 2008), this fee judgment must likewise be reversed. See Viets v. Am. Recruiters Enters., Inc., 922 So. 2d 1090, 1096 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006); Amorello v. Tauck, 824 So. 2d 244 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); ARC Foods, Inc. v. MGI Props., 746 So. 2d 514 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); Fieldstone v. Chung, 416 So. 2d 11 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). Reversed.…
-
Packaging Corp. OF Am. v. DeRYCKE, 49 So. 3d 286 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010)…settlement, the trial court entered a judgment awarding her $400,000 in fees and $110,000 in costs. Because we are reversing and remanding for a new trial, we must, necessarily, reverse the award of fees and costs. See ARC Foods, Inc. v. MGI Props., 746 So. 2d 514, 514 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). [*295] Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for a new trial. WALLACE and BLACK, JJ., Concur. . Booth v. Mary Carter Paint Co., 202 So. 2d 8 (Fla. 2d DCA 1967), rejected by Ward v. Ochoa, 284 So. 2d 385 (Fla.197…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- M.P. v. Dept. OF Child. & Families, 717 So. 2d 114 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)
- ARC Foods, Inc. v. MGI Props., 724 So. 2d 663 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999)