BRITAMCO UNDERWRITERS, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
O.A.G. CORPORATION, D/B/A LA CASA CRIOLLA, AND GEORGINA MESSIR, APPELLEES
BRITAMCO UNDERWRITERS, INC., APPELLANT,
O.A.G. CORPORATION, D/B/A LA CASA CRIOLLA, AND GEORGINA MESSIR, APPELLEES
750 So. 2d 158
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2000)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
As the argument made on appeal was not presented to the trial judge, it is not preserved for appellate review and we decline to entertain it. See Clock v. Clock, 649 So. 2d 312, 315 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995). We need not consider the appellees’ alternative arguments for affirmance.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Price v. State, 764 So. 2d 694 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000)…e the product of a negotiated plea agreement, the State must have the opportunity to determine whether it will accept a plea agreement, or whether the case should proceed to trial. Rainey v. State, 741 So. 2d 1207 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); Clay v. State, 750 So. 2d 158 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); Akins v. State, 691 So. 2d 587 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). Accordingly, we VACATE Appellant’s sentence and REMAND for further proceedings. We also certify the following question certified in Woods as one of great public importance: D…
Authorities Cited
- Clock v. Vikki Clock, 649 So. 2d 312 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)