NORBERT GRUPE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
NORBERT GRUPE, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
754 So. 2d 810
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2000)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm appellant’s conviction. He was sentenced pursuant to the 1995 sentencing guidelines. We reverse appellant’s sentence on the authority of Heggs v. State, No. SC98851, — So. 2d -, - 2000 WL 178052 (Fla. Feb.17, 2000), and remand to the trial court for resentencing.
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART and REMANDED.
DELL, STONE and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Caruso v. Caruso, 814 So. 2d 498 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)…f marital assets; in the absence of a “valid separation agreement,” the “cut-off date for determining” marital assets is “the date of the filing of a petition for dissolution of marriage.” § 61.075(6), [*505] Fla. Stat. (2000); see Boulis v. Boulis, 754 So. 2d 810, 811 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). The clear language of the statute does not allow for flexibility in the identification of a marital asset. This case stands for the proposition that for an asset to be characterized as a marital asset, it must be in existen…
-
Bell v. Renar Dev. Co., 811 So. 2d 780 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)…affidavit is invalid as it was not properly sworn. We have reviewed the record and conclude that the Bells failed to either plead, argue, or allege that the form of the affidavit was invalid for not having been properly sworn. See Boulis v. Boulis, 754 So. 2d 810 n. 1 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)(citing Tillman v. State, 471 So. 2d 32, 35 (Fla.1985)). See also Paulk v. Peyton, 648 So. 2d 772 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). While the Bells did, as they claim in their reply brief, “allude” to the argument in closing, this was not…