ANTONEEZE HAYNES, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A Florida appellate court held that a prisoner cannot extend the deadline for filing a belated rule 3.850 postconviction motion based on reliance on a paralegal services company to locate counsel, distinguishing the case from Steele v. Kehoe, which allowed extensions when retained counsel failed to timely file.
The court held that Steele cannot be extended to Haynes's situation because Steele requires actual retention of a lawyer, and Haynes had only retained a non-lawyer paralegal services organization and never actually retained counsel.
[1] A prisoner may file a belated rule 3.850 motion if the deadline is missed due to the failure of retained counsel to file the motion.
[2] Reliance on a non-lawyer organization to secure counsel for filing a rule 3.850 motion does not constitute an exception to the motion's timely filing deadline.
Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“a prisoner should be allowed to file a belated rule 3.850 motion, if the deadline is missed because the prisoner's lawyer had agreed to file the motion and failed to do so”
Statement of the Steele holding that appellant sought to extend to his circumstances
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAppellant Haynes retained CompuData-Freedom Press, Inc., a Virginia-based paralegal services company, paying $700 and relying on it to obtain counsel …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
KLEIN, J.
In Steele v. Kehoe, 747 So. 2d 931 (Fla.1999), the Florida Supreme Court held that a prisoner should be allowed to file a belated rule 3.850 motion, if the deadline is missed because the prisoner’s lawyer had agreed to file the motion and failed to do so. Appellant asks us to extend Steele to his situation, in which he was relying on a Virginia corporation named CompuData-Freedom Press, Inc. to obtain counsel to file his motion on time. We conclude that we cannot.
CompuData Freedom Press, Inc., based in Woodbridge, Virginia, lists on its letterhead “Paralegal Services — Parole Planning — Business Services — Technical Referral Services.” The letterhead also contains a separate post office box for a “Prisoner Support Division.” Appellant has attached correspondence to him from CompuData indicating that CompuData intended to file something on behalf of appellant and that it was in the process of seeking counsel in Florida to do so. Also attached is a copy of a check payable to CompuData in the amount of $700.
The letters from CompuData indicate that CompuData was retained by appellant in ample time to have filed a motion. CompuData wrote appellant several letters which led appellant to believe that they were working on his case and would file something, but it was never done. One of the letters said that CompuData currently had “one resource attorney in Coral Gables, Mr. Michael O’Kane, and our lead attorney who is located in Detroit, Michigan, who is currently seeking his license to practice in Florida.” That letter, dated May 31, 1996, indicated that all of their Florida cases, which included appellant’s, were “planned for filing” in June, 1996. CompuData apparently never did anything for appellant, and it can be inferred from their correspondence that appellant, as well as other prisoners, were simply being strung along for a rather unfortunate ride.
In Steele, our supreme court held that, on receiving a petition such as that filed by Steele, the trial court should “conduct a hearing on whether [counsel] undertook to file a rule 3.850 motion on Steele’s behalf, but failed to timely file the motion.” The court also, in Steele, amended rule 3.850(b) to expressly make retained counsel’s failure to timely file a motion an exception to the two year time limitation.
Although we are sympathetic with the plight of appellant, we do not see how he would be able to comply with the requirements of Steele. At most, he would be able to demonstrate that he relied on a non-lawyer organization to find him a lawyer who would file the motion. Because Steele requires the retention of a lawyer, and it is clear from appellant’s pleadings that he had not retained one, we must affirm.
GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Parker v. State, 907 So. 2d 694 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)…cusable neglect standard. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for extension without a hearing. Here, Parker’s family did not retain a lawyer prior to the expiration of [*696] the two-year deadline. See Haynes v. State, 757 So. 2d 517 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). Affirmed. STONE and KLEIN, JJ., concur.…
-
Kevan L. Giles v. State, 773 So. 2d 1167 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)…necessarily relies on an inmate law clerk, would lose the right to seek postconviction relief while a similar defendant with retained counsel would not.3 Two cases from the Fourth District merit discussion on this issue. First, in Haynes v. State, 757 So. 2d 517 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), the court refused to extend the Steele exception to an inmate who relied on a nonlawyer organization to timely file his rule 3.850 motion. Second, in Davis v. Singletary, 716 So. 2d 273 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), the court granted a b…
-
Gatlin v. State, 777 So. 2d 1087 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)…to Gatlin filing a facially sufficient petition for writ of habeas corpus alleging that he is entitled to file a belated rule 3.850 motion. See Medrano v. State, 748 So. 2d 986 (Fla.1999); Steele v. Kehoe, 747 So. 2d 931 (Fla.1999); Haynes v. State, 757 So. 2d 517 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Giles v. State, 773 So. 2d 1167 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). FULMER, A.C.J., and CASANUEYA and STRINGER, JJ., concur.…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Steele v. Kehoe, 747 So. 2d 931 (Fla. 1999)