CHURCH OF GOD IN CHRIST, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ORLANDO, ET AL., APPELLEES
CHURCH OF GOD IN CHRIST, INC., APPELLANT,
BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ORLANDO, ET AL., APPELLEES
758 So. 2d 1181
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2000)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
GRIFFIN, J.
Appellant seeks review of an order of the lower court dissolving a previously entered temporary injunction. We affirm because no legal error has been identified and no record adequate to demonstrate error has been provided.
AFFIRMED.
ANTOON, C.J., and ORFINGER, M„ Senior Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Valdes v. Ibis Morejon Valdes, 894 So. 2d 264 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004)…’s claim to her rightful share of the marital asset consisting of the enhanced value of Mr. Irwin’s separate property that resulted from the contribution of marital funds or labor.” Irwin, 857 So. 2d at 248 (citations omitted); Witowski v. Witowski, 758 So. 2d 1181 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). In the instant ease, the prenuptial agreement does not address enhancement value. See Worley v. Worley, 855 So. 2d 632, 634 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)(A prenuptial agreement does not waive the right to enhancement in value of “non-marit…1 / 2
-
Hahamovitch v. Hahamovitch, 133 So. 3d 1008 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014)…reement waive Mrs. Irwin’s claim to her rightful share of the marital asset consisting of the enhanced value of Mr. Irwin’s separate property that resulted from the contribution of marital funds or labor.”) (citations omitted); Witowski v. Witowski, 758 So. 2d 1181, 1185 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (“Without a specific provision in the antenuptial agreement that the husband’s salary will be his separate property, it is not a protected asset.”). The Second District has also held that a simple waiver of appreciation or…
-
Irwin v. Irwin, 857 So. 2d 247 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)…arnings as his separate property, and thus did not exclude Mrs. Irwin’s claim to share in the value of assets pur [*249] chased with those earnings. See Worley v. Worley, 2003 WL 21817921, 855 So. 2d 632, 633 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); Witowski v. Witowski 758 So. 2d 1181 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). Nor did the agreement waive Mrs. Irwin’s claim to her rightful share of the marital asset consisting of the enhanced value of Mr. Irwin’s separate property that resulted from the contribution of marital funds or labor. Worley; Wi…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence