ANDREW JAMES OWENS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 2000-05-26
No. 5D00-129
DAUKSCH, HARRIS and PLEUS, JJ, concur. ,
758 So. 2d 1234 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2000) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

See Simboli v. State, 728 So. 2d 792 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999).

AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH, HARRIS and PLEUS, JJ, concur. ,


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Waxman v. Truman, 792 So. 2d 657 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)
    …992). In other words, the fact that a present value award for future economic damages is the same as the future value sum does not mean that the jury failed to follow the instructions to reduce the future sum award to present value. Alesse v. Baker, 758 So. 2d 1234, 1235-36 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000). Here, the trial court ordered a new trial because it erroneously believed that the present value of an award for future economic damages must be less than the total amount of future economic damages awarded. Because the…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw