TWON ADAMS, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
TWON ADAMS, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
759 So. 2d 742
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2000)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.
Although it appears that his offenses occurred within the “window period,” see Salters v. State, 758 So. 2d 667 (Fla.2000), the record affirmatively shows that the appellant was sentenced as a habitual violent felony offender without regard to aggravated stalking, the qualifying offense added by chapter 95-182, Laws of Florida, which was in turn invalidated by State v. Thompson, 750 So. 2d 643 (Fla.1999). His claim that Thompson entitles him to post conviction relief is therefore without merit. See Gulley v. State, 758 So. 2d 635 (Fla.2000).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Mann v. State, 825 So. 2d 1061 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)…re corrected by the subsequent sentencing orders and the point is now moot. As to point two, the predicate offense for habitualization as a habitual violent felony offender (HVO) was aggravated assault, not aggravated stalking. See Adams v. State, 759 So. 2d 742 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). As to point three, the plea bargain was .plainly for an HVO sentence. We reject point four on authority of Rodriguez v. State, 766 So. 2d 1147 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). Affirmed.…
Authorities Cited
- State v. Thompson, 750 So. 2d 643 (Fla. 1999)
- Salters v. State, 758 So. 2d 667 (Fla. 2000)
- Tarvan Gulley v. State, 758 So. 2d 635 (Fla. 2000)