JOHN W. MANN, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2002-09-18
No. 3D02-2263
Before JORGENSON, COPE and GODERICH, JJ.
825 So. 2d 1061 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2002)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the sentencing order was not a prohibited general sentence and that the issue of sentence length was moot. The court also affirmed the denial of the motion to correct an illegal sentence regarding the predicate offense for habitualization.


Facts & Procedural History

John W. Mann appealed an order denying his motion to correct an illegal sentence. He argued the sentencing order was a prohibited general sentence, th…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

John W. Mann appeals an order denying his motion to correct illegal sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. We affirm.

We have taken judicial notice of this court’s file in Mann v. State, 824 So. 2d 330 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002). As to point one, the sentencing order designates the counts to which it applies and is not a prohibited “general sentence.” To the extent that defendant-appellant Mann is claiming that the sentences on counts two and three exceeded the legal maximum when imposed in 1997, the sentences on those counts were corrected by the subsequent sentencing orders and the point is now moot.

As to point two, the predicate offense for habitualization as a habitual violent felony offender (HVO) was aggravated assault, not aggravated stalking. See Adams v. State, 759 So. 2d 742 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000).

As to point three, the plea bargain was .plainly for an HVO sentence. We reject point four on authority of Rodriguez v. State, 766 So. 2d 1147 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000).

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw