ROBERT JOHNNY JACKSON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 2000-07-05
No. 4D99-0221
POLEN, KLEIN and HAZOURI, JJ„ concur
761 So. 2d 1232 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2000) Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases
Topics
Prison Releasee Reoffender Act Standing

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Prison Releasee Reoffender Act cases and more on FLexlaw

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Robert Johnny Jackson timely appeals after a jury convicted him of robbery with a deadly weapon. He was sentenced as a prison releasee reoffender to life in prison. He challenges that the Prison Releasee Reoffender Act violates the single subject requirement of the Florida Constitution. Notwithstanding that Jackson does not have standing to make this argument,1 the supreme court has recently held that the Act is constitutional. State v. Cotton, 25 Fla. L. Weekly S463, — So. 2d -, 2000 WL 766521 (Fla. June 15, 2000).

AFFIRMED.

POLEN, KLEIN and HAZOURI, JJ„ concur

. He lacks standing to make this attack because he committed the instant offense on January 18, 1998; the Act was codified on May 30, 1997. Once reenacted as a portion of the Florida statutes, a chapter law is no longer subject to challenge on this ground. State v. Johnson, 616 So. 2d 1, 2 (Fla.1993).

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Heath v. State, 840 So. 2d 307 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)
    …county court pursuant to a document called a “memorandum of sentence,” or as it is otherwise known, a “snapout.” Due to the “mischief’ that these snapouts can cause on review, this court has expressed concern over their use. See Richardson v. State, 761 So. 2d 1232 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); Peterson v. State, 730 So. 2d 830, 831 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); Grantham v. State, 735 So. 2d 525 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). Based on this case-law, the petitioners appealed their adjudications to the circuit court challenging the county cou…
  • Zaborowski v. State, 126 So. 3d 405 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013)
    …xpressed concern over the use of snap-out sentencing memoran-da based on the mischief that they can cause. See Sutton v. State, 838 So. 2d 616, 617 n. 1 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); Heath v. State, 840 So. 2d 307, 308 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); Richardson v. State, 761 So. 2d 1232, 1233 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); Peterson v. State, 730 So. 2d 830, 831 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); Grantham v. State, 735 So. 2d 525, 526 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). . It does appear that Zaborowski attempted to obtain reconsideration of the matter through the trial cou…
  • Phillips v. State, 198 So. 3d 789 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016)
    …Crow, 903 So. 2d 346, 350-51 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Sutton v. State, 838 So. 2d 616, 617 n. 1 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); Heath v. State, 840 So. 2d 307, 308-09 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); Monroe v. State, 784 So. 2d 1163, 1164 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); Richardson v. State, 761 So. 2d 1232, 1233 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); Monroe v. State, 760 So. 2d 289, 289-90 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); Peterson v. State, 730 So. 2d 830, 831 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). . The supreme court has recognized the use of rule 3.575 as an appropriate vehicle for interviewing jur…

Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw