MAURICE E. HOLLOMAN, APPELLANT,

v.

LORI WHEELER, ESQUIRE, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• Watrous v. State, 793 So. 2d 6 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)
  …a qualifying offense automatically puts a person at risk for commitment, it does not automatically result in that person’s commitment.6 We conclude therefore that commitment under the Act is a collateral consequence of a plea. See Pearman v. State, 764 So. 2d 739 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). Other state and federal courts have reached the same conclusion with regard to similar statutes allowing for the civil commitment of sexual predators. See, e.g., George v. Black, 732 F. 2d 108 (8th Cir. 1984); Martin v. Reinste…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Roberti v. State, 782 So. 2d 919 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)
  …is claim stating that commitment under the Act is a collateral consequence of a plea about which the defendant need not be warned. See Watrous v. State, 26 Fla. L. Weekly D686, - So. 2d -, 2001 WL 219982 (Fla. 2d DCA Mar. 7, 2001); Pearman v. State, 764 So. 2d 739 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). While this is a correct statement of the law, it fails to address Roberti’s actual claim. Roberti alleged not that counsel failed to advise him that his pleas could subject him to commitment under the Act, but rather that counse…
• Nelson v. State, 780 So. 2d 294 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)
  …f these designations before entering a plea, because they are collateral, rather than direct, consequences resulting from his convictions of certain sexual offenses. See, e.g., Donovan v. State, 773 So. 2d 1264 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000); Pearman v. State, 764 So. 2d 739 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Oce v. State, 742 So. 2d 464 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999), cause dismissed, 763 So. 2d 1044 (Fla.2000); LaMonica v. State, 732 So. 2d 1175 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Burkett v. State, 731 So. 2d 695 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998); Collie v. State, 710 So.…

Authorities Cited

• Steele v. Kehoe, 747 So. 2d 931 (Fla. 1999)