KIMBALL E. REESE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
KIMBALL E. REESE, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
771 So. 2d 1266
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2000)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
WHATLEY, Judge.
In this appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Kimball E. Reese challenges his convictions in eight cases. Our independent review of the record reveals no ground for reversal. However, the public defender has drawn our attention to the fact that the trial court failed to sentence Reese on his misdemeanor convictions in case nos. 98-695 and 98-697.
Accordingly, we remand with directions that the trial court sentence Reese in case nos. 98-695 and 98-697.
Convictions affirmed; remanded with directions.
NORTHCUTT and SALCINES, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Snipes v. State, 843 So. 2d 1043 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)…eal proceedings are pending in an appellate court, the trial court is without jurisdiction to consider the merits of a motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to rule 3.850. Daniels v. State, 712 So. 2d 765, 765 (Fla.1998); Cannady v. State, 771 So. 2d 1266 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). As such, had Snipes filed his postconviction motion during the pendency of the appeal in this court, the trial court would have been without jurisdiction to entertain it. Snipes’s two-year window to pursue postconviction relief,…
Authorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)