JAMES L. CHANDLER, PETITIONER,
v.
DONALD MANNING, DIRECTOR, DADE COUNTY CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, RESPONDENT

Fla. 3d DCA | 1997-03-27
No. 97-842
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and COPE and GERSTEN, JJ.
773 So. 2d 65 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1997) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Because, as the respondent jailer apparently concedes, the record not only does not support, but is directly contrary to the trial court’s pro forma finding that the petitioner, who is incarcerated pursuant to an order of civil contempt for his failure to pay child support, has the present ability to pay the purge amount, the petition for Habeas Corpus is granted with directions that he forthwith be discharged from custody. Betancourt v. Manning, 679 So. 2d 88 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Roundtree v. Felton, 656 So. 2d 584 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); Johnson v. Felton, 655 So. 2d 1286 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); Blanco v. Roth, 655 So. 2d 213 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995). See generally Pompey v. Cochran, 685 So. 2d 1007 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).

Petition granted.1

. This action is of course without prejudice to any appropriate action to secure Chandler’s compliance with his support obligations.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw