GARNETT DWAYNE BOWE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
GARNETT DWAYNE BOWE, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
779 So. 2d 563
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2001)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
DELL, STEVENSON and GROSS, JJ., concur.
Other
PER CURIAM.
Appellant’s motion for rehearing and/or motion to certify question of great public importance is hereby denied. See Hall v. State, 767 So. 2d 560 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).
DELL, STEVENSON and GROSS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bioscience W., Inc. v. Gulfstream Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 185 So. 3d 638 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016)…interest at the time of loss. The property owner’s insurable interest is imputed to the post-loss assignee.”). This is because the right to insurance benefits generally matures as soon as the loss materializes. Cf. Williams v. Auto Owners Ins. Co., 779 So. 2d 563, 565 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (quoting Counihan v. Allstate Ins. Co., 25 F. 3d 109, 113 (2d Cir.1994)). Furthermore, our court has recently,noted that the “loss-payment provision of the policy did not render the suit premature; indeed, that provision expr…
Authorities Cited
- Artis J. Kelly v. State, 767 So. 2d 560 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)
- Wester v. State, 767 So. 2d 560 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)