TROY OLIVER CALDEIRA, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
TROY OLIVER CALDEIRA, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
779 So. 2d 601
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2001)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Any complaint appellant may have about how the Department of Corrections interprets his sentences must be addressed through administrative proceedings and, if necessary, by petition for writ of mandamus filed in the circuit court in the county in which he is incarcerated. See Killings v. State, 567 So. 2d 60 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).
KLEIN, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
COX v. State of Florida/Appellee, 805 So. 2d 1042 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)…in the 1994 guidelines, the trial court summarily denied relief, and this court affirmed, but without prejudice to Appellant’s filing a timely sworn rule 3.850 motion challenging the voluntary and intelligent character of his plea. See Cox v. State, 779 So. 2d 601 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (citing Mortimer v. State, 770 So. 2d 743 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)). Appellant then filed the instant rule 3.850 motion in which he alleged that, had he known the guidelines in effect when he entered his plea were going to be declare…
Authorities Cited
- Forney v. State, 567 So. 2d 60 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990)
- Killings v. State, 567 So. 2d 60 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990)