STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER,

v.

ANN ELLIOTT BARBER, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By (34 total)

• Moore v. Corr. Med. Servs., 817 So. 2d 963 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002)
  …to prosecute the action to final disposition. Absent a showing that the trial court has failed to take action on some pending matter he has noticed for hearing, Moore has failed to establish an entitlement to mandamus relief. See Al-Hakim, v. State, 783 So. 2d 293 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001). Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. ALLEN, C.J., MINER and BROWNING, JJ., concur.…
• State v. Storer, 920 So. 2d 754 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006)
  …he State from presenting evidence that was critical to its case. See, e.g., State v. Richman, 861 So. 2d 1195 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); State v. Davis, 857 So. 2d 349 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); State v. Smith, 586 So. 2d 1237 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); State v. Barber, 783 So. 2d 293 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001). On at least two occasions, the State has successfully petitioned to prevent the defense from introducing evidence. In each of these cases, however, the trial court seems to have violated clearly established rules of evidence or…
• Thomas v. State, 74 So. 3d 145 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011)
  …file such motions as may be necessary and bring those motions to the trial court’s attention for a ruling. Absent a showing that an express and distinct demand for performance of this sort has been made, mandamus will not lie. See Al-Hakim v. State, 783 So. 2d 293 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001). [*146] Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied on the merits. DAVIS, VAN NORTWICK, and ROWE, JJ., concur.…

Authorities Cited

• Williams v. State, 110 So. 2d 654 (Fla. 1959)
• State v. Pettis, 520 So. 2d 250 (Fla. 1988)
• Richardson v. State, 706 So. 2d 1349 (Fla. 1998)
• State v. Smith, 586 So. 2d 1237 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)
• Barber v. State, 781 So. 2d 425 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)