FREDERICK L. THOMAS, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE AND TYKISHA NICOLE SMALL, RESPONDENT
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Motion Practice cases and more on FLexlaw
Petitioner files a petition for writ of mandamus seeking to compel the circuit court to rule on petitioner’s request for a paternity test. Petitioner misunderstands the duty of the trial court in matters such as this. In an ordinary civil action, the trial court is under no obligation to rule on a complaint, motion or request on its own initiative. Instead, it is the litigant’s obligation to take such actions as are necessary to prosecute the case to final disposition, and, in the course of that, to file such motions as may be necessary and bring those motions to the trial court’s attention for a ruling. Absent a showing that an express and distinct demand for performance of this sort has been made, mandamus will not lie. See Al-Hakim v. State, 783 So.2d 293 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001).
*146Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied on the merits.
DAVIS, VAN NORTWICK, and ROWE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (12 total)
-
Rodger Butler v. Bartley, 118 So. 3d 859 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013)
-
Faison v. GGO Prison Facility & COL. Corr. Inst., 145 So. 3d 884 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014)
-
Grady M. Kittrell v. Kittrell, 146 So. 3d 1288 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014)
Previewing 3 of 12 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- State v. Barber, 783 So. 2d 293 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)
- Marzuq Al-Hakim v. State, 783 So. 2d 293 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)