JOAQUIN A. CASTELLON, APPELLANT,
v.
AMERICAN SKYHAWK INSURANCE CO., APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See § 627.728(5), Fla. Stat. (1996) (“United States postal proof of mailing or certified or registered mailing of notice of cancellation ... of reasons for cancellation ... to the named insured at the address shown in the policy shall be sufficient proof of notice.”); Glenney v. Service Ins. Co., 660 So. 2d 1132, 1133 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995) (allowing the carrier to establish compliance by postal proof of mailing, even though the insured claimed nonreceipt of the notice).
We also reject appellant Joaquin A. Castellon’s argument that the insurer has to prove that the reason for cancellation, here that the State had suspended the insured’s driving privileges, is true. The carrier need not undertake further investigation, provided that the carrier has a good faith basis to believe that the reason for cancellation is in fact true.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bigler v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n & Bath & Body Works, Inc., 841 So. 2d 610 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)…tes, in accordance with countless decisions of this and every other Florida court, that a mis [*611] take in judgment of this kind does not, as a matter of law, amount to disqualifying misconduct. See Castillo v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 785 So. 2d 552 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001); Savage v. Macy’s East, Inc., 719 So. 2d 1208, 1208-09 n. 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); Castillo v. Sally Beauty Co., 637 So. 2d 269 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); King v. Walgreen Co., 635 So. 2d 997 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); Kelley v. Pueblo Wholesale C…
-
Zavala v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 886 So. 2d 319 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004)…below denying unemployment compensation benefits is reversed because the conduct complained of did not, as a matter of law, amount to disqualifying “misconduct.” § 443.036(29), Fla. Stat. (2003); Castillo v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, 785 So. 2d 552 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). After remand, the appellant shall be awarded the benefits claimed.…
-
Riesco v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n & Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd., 889 So. 2d 119 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004)…ecision below denying unemployment compensation benefits is reversed because the conduct complained of did not, as a matter law, amount to disqualifying “misconduct.” § 443.036(29), Fla. Stat. (2003); Castillo v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 785 So. 2d 552 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). After remand, the appellant shall be awarded the benefits claimed.…
Authorities Cited
- Glenney v. Serv. Ins. Co., 660 So. 2d 1132 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)