ANGEL E. ZAVALA, APPELLANT,
v.
FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES
ANGEL E. ZAVALA, APPELLANT,
FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES
886 So. 2d 319
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2004)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The decision below denying unemployment compensation benefits is reversed because the conduct complained of did not, as a matter of law, amount to disqualifying “misconduct.” § 443.036(29), Fla. Stat. (2003); Castillo v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, 785 So. 2d 552 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). After remand, the appellant shall be awarded the benefits claimed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hampton v. State, 949 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)…nying his motion to dismiss his pending rule 3.850 motion as moot. We treat the appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari and grant it. We affirmed Defendant’s conviction and sentence in L.T. case no. 02-4814 by written opinion, Hampton v. State, 886 So. 2d 319 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004), rev. denied, 898 So. 2d 937 (Fla.2005). The supreme court denied review on March 3, 2005. Thus, the time within which Defendant may file a timely rule 3.850 motion was not to expire until Monday, March 5, 2007. He filed such a m…
-
Alford v. State (Fla. 4th DCA 2025)
Authorities Cited
- Castillo v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 785 So. 2d 552 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)
- Castellon v. Am. Skyhawk Ins. Co., 785 So. 2d 552 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)