STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, APPELLANT,
v.
SUSAN LEVINE, APPELLEE
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, APPELLANT,
SUSAN LEVINE, APPELLEE
791 So. 2d 591
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2001)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The defendant below appeals from a final judgment entered after a jury verdict for the plaintiff. We affirm due to State Farm’s lack of due diligence in investigating juror nondisclosure. See De La Rosa v. Zequeira, 659 So. 2d 239 (Fla.1995); Tejada v. Roberts, 760 So. 2d 960 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000), review granted, No. SC00-1080, 786 So. 2d 1188 (Fla. Nov. 13, 2000). The minimal efforts made to obtain evidence of a nondisclosure came too late. See Tejada, 760 So. 2d at 966.
AFFIRMED.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Levine, 837 So. 2d 363 (Fla. 2002)…LEWIS, J. We have for review State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Levine, 791 So. 2d 591 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001), which expressly and directly conflicts with our decision in Roberts v. Tejada, 814 So. 2d 334 (Fla.2002). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. For the reasons stated herein, we quash the district court’s decis…
-
State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Levine, 875 So. 2d 663 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004)…trial court. On appeal, this court affirmed on the basis of Tejada v. Roberts, 760 So. 2d 960 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (holding that State Farm did not exercise due diligence in investigating juror nondisclosure). See State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Levine, 791 So. 2d 591 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). The case was then appealed to the Florida Supreme Court. While this case was pending before the Florida Supreme Court, the Florida Supreme Court reversed this Court’s decision in Tejada. See Roberts v. Tejada, 814 So. 2d 334 (Fl…
-
Mills v. State, 880 So. 2d 616 (Fla. 2004)…PER CURIAM. We have for review Mills v. State, 791 So. 2d 591 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001), which expressly and directly conflicts with our decision in Harvey v. State, 848 So. 2d 1060 (Fla.2003). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. We accept jurisdiction in this case, quash the decision of the Fir…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- DE LA Rosa v. Zequeira, 659 So. 2d 239 (Fla. 1995)
- Francisco Tejada, M.D. v. Roberts, 760 So. 2d 960 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)