MARK D. MILLS, PETITIONER,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Hines v. State, 931 So. 2d 148 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006)
  …etitioner] will regain competency within the near future.” However, the trial court denied Petitioner’s motion to dismiss, relying on Byrd v. State, 834 So. 2d 872 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) (Benton and Lewis, JJ., concur in result only), review dismissed, 880 So. 2d 616 (Fla.2004), rather than following the clear language of section 916.303(1). In Byrd, Judge Miner explained that Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.213(a) “superseded” section 916.303(1). Id. at 873. Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.213(a) sta…
• Isiah Jackson v. State, 926 So. 2d 1262 (Fla. 2006)
  …ition seeking review of a district court decision is styled, this Court does not have jurisdiction to review per curiam decisions rendered without opinion”). In fact, we have even applied Jenkins in the context of mandatory review. In Byrd v. State, 880 So. 2d 616, 617 (Fla.2004), we determined that we lacked jurisdiction over a case in which a concurring opinion declared a statute invalid, because Jenkins required that the language warranting jurisdiction be included in the majority opinion. Applying this s…
• Ned Pole v. State, 198 So. 3d 961 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016)
  …sal to join in the majority’s opinion and its reasoning.” Harry Lee Anstead, Gerald Kogan, Thomas D. Hall & Robert Craig Waters, The Operation and Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of Florida, 29 Nova L. Rev. 431, 460 (2005); see also Byrd v. State, 880 So. 2d 616, 617 (Fla.2004) (holding that First District opinion declaring statute invalid was not the actual decision' of the district court because only one of three judges signed it and the other two judges concurred in result — affirming the trial court’s d…

Authorities Cited

• Brannon v. State, 850 So. 2d 452 (Fla. 2003)
• Harvey v. State, 848 So. 2d 1060 (Fla. 2003)
• State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Levine, 791 So. 2d 591 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)
• Mills v. State, 791 So. 2d 591 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)