ROBERT JOSEPH MOLINARI, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ROBERT JOSEPH MOLINARI, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
792 So. 2d 583
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2001)
Opinion of the Court
[*584] PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Bolin v. State, 736 So. 2d 1160, 1166 (Fla.1999) (“[T]he decision as to individual and sequestered voir dire is a discretionary decision for the trial judge.”); See also Way v. State, 774 So. 2d 896 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Salas v. State, 544 So. 2d 1040 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989). See also Robinson v.. State, 438 So. 2d 8, 9 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983) (addressing the procedure to be followed when a claim of potentially prejudicial publicity arises after the jury has been selected); Bullard v. State, 324 So. 2d 652 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Bolin v. State, 736 So. 2d 1160 (Fla. 1999)
- Robinson v. State, 438 So. 2d 8 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983)
- Lucio John Salas v. State, 544 So. 2d 1040 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989)
- Mills v. State, 324 So. 2d 652 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976)
- Eston Bullard, Jr. v. State, 324 So. 2d 652 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975)
- WAY v. State, 774 So. 2d 896 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)