VICTOR WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
VICTOR WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
793 So. 2d 1092
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2001)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We have carefully considered all 19 points appellant argued in support of his motion for relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, as well as the state’s response filed in the trial court, and the judge’s order denying relief. We find no merit in any of the arguments appellant has raised, and thus dispense with the necessity of having the state file an answer brief, and affirm.
POLEN, C.J., KLEIN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
OFF Lease Only, Inc. v. LeJEUNE Auto Wholesale, Inc., 187 So. 3d 868 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016)…ary judgment, and also filed a motion for leave to aménd its complaint. At the hearing , on Car Factory’s summary judgment motion, Car Factory contended, and the trial court agreed, that our decision in Bio-Med Plus, Inc. v. Health Coalition, Inc., 793 So. 2d 1092 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001) was dispositive of the issue and required entry of summary judgment because Off Lease was not a “consumer” and therefore could not maintain an action for either injunctive relief or damages under FDUTPA.1 The court entered final…
-
Bio-Med Plus, Inc. v. Shikany, 869 So. 2d 12 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004)…or abuse of discretion in the order on appeal denying injunctive relief. See 29 Fla.Jur.2d Injunctions §§ 1, 13 (1998).1 Affirmed. . We express no view on the availability of any other relief. See Bio-Med Plus, Inc. v. Health Coalition, Inc., 793 So. 2d 1092 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001).…