SIDNEY AVILES, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Rule 3.800(A) Motion cases and more on FLexlaw
GRIFFIN, J.
Defendant, Sidney Aviles, appeals the summary denial of his Rule 3.800(a) mo tion and his amended Rule 3.800(a) motion. He also filed a motion to construe the prior motions as an emergency petition for writ of habeas corpus, which was denied. We find no basis for relief.
In defendant’s Rule 3.800(a) motion, he claims that he is entitled to credit for time served in a drug treatment center. He also claims there were errors on his guideline scoresheet. The trial court correctly denied the claim for credit, relying on Williamson v. State, 765 So. 2d 89 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000), in which the court held that a defendant is not entitled to credit for time served in a drug treatment program. See also Taylor v. State, 726 So. 2d 348 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). The trial court also correctly denied the scoresheet error claims as meritless or not cognizable in a Rule 3.800(a) motion. See Mathis v. State, 738 So. 2d 414 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied, 751 So. 2d 51 (Fla.1999).
AFFIRMED.
SHARP, W. and ORFINGER, R.B., J.J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Taylor v. State, 726 So. 2d 348 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)
- Williamson v. State, 765 So. 2d 89 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000)
- Letarius Mathis v. State, 738 So. 2d 414 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999)