CENTRAL FLORIDA FRAMING/ SUNSHINE STAFF LEASING; AND UNITED STATES EMPLOYER & UNITED STATES EMPLOYER & CONSUMER SELF INSURER FUND C/O LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,
v.
MICHAEL ANDREWS, CLAIMANT; CENTRAL FLORIDA FRAMING/ STAFF LEASING, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, E/C # 1; AND CENTRAL FLORIDA FRAMING, E/C # 2, APPELLEES, V. MICHAEL ANDREWS, CLAIMANT/CROSS-APPELLANT
CENTRAL FLORIDA FRAMING/ SUNSHINE STAFF LEASING; AND UNITED STATES EMPLOYER & UNITED STATES EMPLOYER & CONSUMER SELF INSURER FUND C/O LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,
MICHAEL ANDREWS, CLAIMANT; CENTRAL FLORIDA FRAMING/ STAFF LEASING, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, E/C # 1; AND CENTRAL FLORIDA FRAMING, E/C # 2, APPELLEES, V. MICHAEL ANDREWS, CLAIMANT/CROSS-APPELLANT
797 So. 2d 640
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2001)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.1
BOOTH, MINER and BARFIELD, JJ., CONCUR. . The cross-appeal is rendered moot by this affirmance.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Jones v. State, 829 So. 2d 383 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)…with a firearm. First, the identifications were not impermissibly suggestive. Perez v. State, 648 So. 2d 715, 719 (Fla.1995). Second, the curative instruction was entirely adequate and the motion for mistrial was properly denied. Desamours v. State, 797 So. 2d 640, 642 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). Third, the trial court acted within its discretion in denying the motion for severance and instead impaneling two separate juries to conduct the simultaneous trial of defendant-appellant Jones and his co-defendant. Minor v.…