NATHANIEL JONES, APPELLANT.
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2002-11-06
No. 3D00-3152
Before COPE, LEVY and FLETCHER, JJ.
829 So. 2d 383 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2002) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the convictions of Nathaniel Jones for grand theft auto without a firearm, fleeing or eluding a police officer, aggravated assault with a firearm, robbery with a firearm, attempted robbery with a firearm and aggravated assault with a firearm. First, the identifications were not impermissibly suggestive. Perez v. State, 648 So. 2d 715, 719 (Fla.1995). Second, the curative instruction was entirely adequate and the motion for mistrial was properly denied. Desamours v. State, 797 So. 2d 640, 642 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). Third, the trial court acted within its discretion in denying the motion for severance and instead impaneling two separate juries to conduct the simultaneous trial of defendant-appellant Jones and his co-defendant. Minor v. State, 763 So. 2d 1169, 1170 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Aponte v. State, 118 So. 3d 236 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013)
    …stconviction); Aponte v. State, 864 So. 2d 419 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004) (table) (denying petition for belated appeal); Aponte v. State, 858 So. 2d 1058 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003) (table) (affirming order denying motion for postconviction relief); Aponte v. State, 829 So. 2d 383 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (affirming order denying motion for postcon-viction relief); Aponte v. State, 834 So. 2d 174 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (table) (affirming order denying motion for postconviction relief).…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw