HOPO CORPORATION, PETITIONER,
v.
ROSEMARIE B. KELLER, RESPONDENT
HOPO CORPORATION, PETITIONER,
ROSEMARIE B. KELLER, RESPONDENT
798 So. 2d 889
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2001)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, HOPO Corporation, seeks certiorari review of an order denying its motion to dissolve a lis pendens. See Archer v. Archer, 692 So. 2d 1009 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Based on our decision in Marbin v. Cohen, 789 So. 2d 1193 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), we grant the petition as HOPO Corporation has not been joined as a party in the pending dissolution of marriage action. We quash the trial court’s order denying the motion to dissolve HOPO’s lis pendens; the motion should have been granted.
POLEN, C.J., STEVENSON and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Katarina Loidl v. I & E Grp., Inc., 927 So. 2d 1016 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006)…against it is without legal basis and must be dissolved.2 See Marbin v. Cohen, 789 So. 2d 1193 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (holding that lis pendens should be discharged against property owner that was not joined in the action below); HOPO Corp. v. Keller, 798 So. 2d 889 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (quashing trial court’s order denying the motion to dissolve the lis pen-dens filed against HOPO because HOPO had not been joined as a party in the pending dissolution of marriage action); M.G. Marine Supply Corp. v. Foreign Trad…
-
S.B. v. State, 834 So. 2d 964 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)…em but, as Appellant had already filed his notice of appeal, it was entered at a time when the court was without jurisdiction and is, therefore, invalid. A disposition order must specify the period of commitment imposed by the court. M.N. v. State, 798 So. 2d 889 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). This requirement is particularly important where, as here, the offenses range from second degree felonies down to second degree misdemeanors. We, therefore, vacate each of the disposition orders entered and remand with instructi…
-
Q.K. v. State, 945 So. 2d 650 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)…n the statutory maximum allowed by law. I.B. v. State, 816 So. 2d 230, 232 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002). “A disposition order must specify the period of commitment imposed by the court.” S.B. v. State, 834 So. 2d 964 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (citing M.N. v. State, 798 So. 2d 889 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (remanding “with instructions to specify the period of commitment, not to exceed the maximum adult sentence for the charge”)). “[LJanguage committing a juvenile for an indeterminate period of time no longer than a specific birthd…
Authorities Cited
- Sherrie Marbin v. Cohen, 789 So. 2d 1193 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)
- Archer v. Archer, 692 So. 2d 1009 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)
- Elliott v. CPA Rental, Inc., 692 So. 2d 1009 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)