TIMOTHY M. PALETTI AND MARK C. PALETTI, APPELLANTS,
v.
RICHARD E. CORBIN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEE OF RICHARD E. CORBIN, TRUST AND CORBIN TRUSTS, YELLOW JACKET MARINA, INC., FLORIDA RIVERBOATS, INC., SUWANNEE BELLE, INC., JOHN A. BARLEY, INDIVIDUALLY AND JOHN A. BARLEY & ASSOCIATES, P.A., APPELLEES
TIMOTHY M. PALETTI AND MARK C. PALETTI, APPELLANTS,
RICHARD E. CORBIN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEE OF RICHARD E. CORBIN, TRUST AND CORBIN TRUSTS, YELLOW JACKET MARINA, INC., FLORIDA RIVERBOATS, INC., SUWANNEE BELLE, INC., JOHN A. BARLEY, INDIVIDUALLY AND JOHN A. BARLEY & ASSOCIATES, P.A., APPELLEES
801 So. 2d 960
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2001)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Having considered the appellant’s response to this Court’s order of September 11, 2001, the Court determines that it does not have jurisdiction to review the Order Granting Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Breach of Contract, rendered July 25, 2001. See Dixon v. Allstate Ins. Co., 609 So. 2d 71 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). The appeal is hereby dismissed.
MINER, WOLF and BENTON, JJ., CONCUR.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Harris v. State, 845 So. 2d 250 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)…that his crimes arose from a single criminal episode or that his claim can be determined without resort to extra-record facts. Therefore, his claim is facially insufficient. See Barron v. State, 827 So. 2d 1063 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Steelman v. State, 801 So. 2d 960 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). We affirm without prejudice to whatever right Harris may have to file a facially sufficient Hale claim under rule 3.800(a). Affirmed. CASANUEVA and SILBERMAN, JJ., concur.…
-
Barron v. State, 827 So. 2d 1063 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002)…e 3.800(a). However, in order to state a facially sufficient claim under that rule, Barron must allege that his claim can be determined without resort to extra-record facts. See Johnson v. State, 807 So. 2d 775 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Steelman v. State, 801 So. 2d 960 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). Therefore, we affirm without prejudice to any right Barron might have to file a facially sufficient claim under rule 3.800(a). Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded. FULMER and DAVIS, JJ., Concur.…
-
Andujar v. State, 808 So. 2d 271 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002)…d to so allege and his motion is facially insufficient. See id. We therefore affirm the order of the trial court without prejudice to any right Andujar might have to file a facially sufficient motion pursuant to rule 8.800(a). See Steelman v. State, 801 So. 2d 960 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). Affirmed. SALCINES, J., and DANAHY, PAUL W., Senior Judge, Concur.…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Dixon v. Allstate Ins. Co., 609 So. 2d 71 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)